All that is required now is a Bull Elk tag.
I like gmx better because they are ~$10 bucks a box cheaper, have better bc and I can't see a difference in on game performance.
Reckon that sex change operation really took?
The gmx was the most accurate in her rifle therefore it`s what we opted to use.I wouldn`t hesitate to use them for any reason. It accounted for two deer this year (one was when the rifle was loaned to a friend) and the terminal performance was amongst the best I have seen. Actually the main body of the GMX is made from gilding metal,rather than from 100% copper like the TTSX.But if they perform as well as the TTSX,and are lower priced,I will certainly consider trying them.
Quite the difference in size and shape for the same caliber and nearly identical weight.I am looking forward to hearing more about the GMX, concerning fouling,accuracy,and expansion.
This will be the only bullet going through my t3.
Any reason to choose one over the other. I ain't no Barnes expert but I know silly when I see it. They work.
They far exceeded the 130 Partitions and were a fare bit better than the Hornady 140's I'd already put to paper.
I started using Barnes bullets because I'm in the Ca condor area.
I also like the lower price. I have had a little more trouble getting good accuracy out of GMX and E-tips than Barnes, but that all tends to be pretty dependent on the rifle.
I have had GMX bullets since yesterday. The plastic tip and hollow are are clones. The GMX is made from guilding metal. Personally I am shooting the 150Gr TTSX in my 7X57 Ack. From internet BS i have deciphered that for full expansion these bullets need around 2700 fps on impact, and at 2000 fps is virtually a non expander. I used the same load that I use for my 168 barnes ttsx. Have you looked at the ballistic gel tests of each? whats your preference of the two chuck? My guess is that with three recovered GMX bullets by one guy in a year the Barnes will outpenetrate the GMX's. Everything shot with them dies ..... dead is dead. I am however impressed with their profile. I have only used the GMX and E-tips in half a dozen rifles, so maybe that's not a big enough sample. The muzzle velocity was ~3000 FPS.
with explanation. These were relatively mild loads, 2900+ fps with a 150 grain bullet.
The bullet seemed to perform very well over a wide range of velocities. All were bang flop DRT. Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3. Are you sure they are GMX's?
The TTSX was dead easy to get to shoot accurately, the easiest I've seen in that rifle. I have shot the 139gr gmx out of my 7mm mag browning a bolt this season and am really impressed with them..
I loaded up some 130 gr. I was not able to get this bullet to shoot well in any gun I own. Thanks . The shots were quite different, one at 60 yards and the other at about 440 yards.
Have you seen a cross section of each? They look pretty slick, how are they gonna sit the magazine/chamber? Re: Barnes TTSX vs Hornady GMX vs others.
That depends entirely on throat dimensions. I've used both. I have shot barnes ttsx for the last 3 season with really good results but will now use the gmxs as i have experienced tighter groups with them and the same solid bullet construction... Great to hear. Another reamer might need to be ordered. ", As for the picture ..... might be cause we're married (DUH), Remember, not everyone has a happy ending, so be happy when you can. It also loves 180gr Nosler eTips. OH BS, the material is copper and tin rather than 100% copper. They should work well as do the Nosler lead frees as they are both just Barnes knockoffs with a slightly different metal compound.
The Barnes have four individual petals and have air between them when expanded. As for performance, I have used the Hornady GMX (which is not made of pure copper, but gilding metal which is a little harder) and the Barnes TSX and TTSX - very close to the TMX functionally.
Sep 29, 2020 #2 J. JOHNNIE WALKER Well-Known Member.
Any reason to choose one over the other. It has me scratching my head on an upcoming project though.
Joined Apr 1, 2013 Messages 339. Chuck, did you seriously drive to town yesterday!??!?!?!
Having never used either one, if I were to chose one it would be the GMX. As you can see, the further off the lands I went, the tighter the group.
.
Naan Recipe By Ranveer Brar, Eric Sykes Net Worth, Best Retopology Software 2020, What Does Ridin Strikers Mean, 1961 D Penny Error Liberty, Meghan Ory Children, Boolean Product Calculator, Traditions Tracker 209 Front Sight, Mortimer Adler How To Mark A Book, Coal Bag Osrs, Run It Back Slang, Kerem Bursin Speaking English, Fire Ants In Oregon, Used Pelican Intruder For Sale, Stages Of Life Essay And Interview, Bingo Online Unblocked, Barbet Breeders Alberta, Rever De Rouler En Voiture Sur L'eau, This Is This Deer Hunter Meaning, Source Code Library, Biomechanics Of Hitting A Baseball, Tohatsu Outboards Near Me, Is La Puente Ghetto, Madden 97 Player Ratings, Wyndham Hotels In Iceland, Prayer For Unity And Teamwork, Alpine Lake Wilderness Backpacking Alpine Lakes Wilderness Area August 13, Fishing Tackle Distributors Florida, Hunger For More Album Sales, Quick Mc20 Gyro, Pfsense Dmz Single Ip, Build And Price 2020 Tahoe, Airsman Hires Funeral Home White Hall Il, Phoenix Farm Summary, Anime Go Apk 2020, 60 Day Review Irs 2020, Wire Color Abbreviations 3 Letter, Carbon Monoxide Electron Configuration, Silk Pyjamas Debenhams, Square Enix Forgot Security Question, John Dowland Lute Tablature Pdf, Rhonda Tollefson Nationality, Terada Guitar Serial Numbers, John Mcbride Linkedin, Country Songs About High School Sweethearts Reuniting,